Humanities Collections and Resources

What are the humanities? According to the 1965 National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act, "The term 'humanities' includes, but is not limited to, the study of the following: language, both modern and classical; linguistics; literature; history; jurisprudence; philosophy; archaeology; comparative religion; ethics; the history, criticism and theory of the arts; those aspects of social sciences which have humanistic content and employ humanistic methods; and the study and application of the humanities to the human environment with particular attention to reflecting our diverse heritage, traditions, and history and to the relevance of the humanities to the current conditions of national life."

May a non-U.S. institution or organization apply for a grant? NEH does not provide support to foreign institutions or organizations. However, American institutions may apply for cooperative projects involving U.S. and foreign organizations, provided support is requested primarily for the U.S. portion of the collaborative effort.

If I receive NEH funding, may I also accept money from other sources? Yes. Applicants are encouraged to seek other financial support. We do ask that you tell us about proposals to other funding sources so we understand the project's financial picture.

May I apply for more than one NEH grant for my project? Yes, if you will require more than two years to complete the project, you may, in a subsequent funding cycle, request additional support.

If I intend to request additional NEH funding to continue my project, do I have to describe the project anew or will evaluators have access to the earlier grant proposal? NEH treats all applications as new applications. Evaluators will not have access to the previous application; therefore, proposals for renewed funding must discuss the project anew. Be sure to describe the work accomplished with previous NEH funding and be clear about the specific activities and products of the new grant.

Will NEH accept late applications? No. To be considered, an application must be accepted by Grants.gov at or before the deadline.

Who is the audience for my grant application? Specialists and non-specialists will review your proposal. Show how the project relates to scholarship in the project's field, and describe its methodology with reference to current standards and best practices. Explain the goals and procedures in simple, understandable terms for non-specialists.

What should I consider in discussing my project's significance to the humanities? Do not assume that the project's significance to research, education, and or public programming will be evident to readers. For projects to preserve and make humanities collections accessible, provide specific examples of important documents or artifacts in the collections and describe how the collections have been used or could be used once they are made accessible. If you are proposing a reference work or research tool, discuss the need for the product and give examples of studies or activities that would be served by it. In the case of research and development projects, explain in non-technical language the value and relevance of the topic to the humanities.

Must a research and development project focus on integrated access? No, you may apply for a research and development project related to any preservation and access issue (e.g., digital preservation or the development of standards and best practices). However, we are especially interested in projects involving integrated access, for which we may provide awards of up to $500,000.

Is it acceptable to incorporate research and development activity within a project to preserve and create access to collections or to produce a reference work? Yes, but be mindful of the purpose and review criteria for research and development efforts, which focus on the advancement of national standards and best practices and the engagement of professional community stakeholders. Simply adding an R & D component to a project on a limited level will not likely make a proposal more competitive.

What kind of detail should be included in the work plan? Explain the tasks for the project's staff and provide a schedule for the completion of the work, which may be presented as a narrative or a chart. Depending on the project, the description of the work plan may be organized by type or duration of activity (e.g., three- or six-month intervals.) The plan should be presented in enough detail to demonstrate that you have thoroughly considered each step of the project and that you are ready to begin. By describing in detail the responsibilities of the project's personnel, you will justify the corresponding allocation of staff time, as shown in the project's budget, and the qualifications and experience required of the project's staff, as reflected in résumés and job descriptions.

If I am applying for a grant to process a collection and put the finding aid on the Internet, do I need to mark up the finding aid using Encoded Archival Description (EAD)? No, but applicants who don't intend to use EAD should explain why. EAD facilitates the searchability and interoperability of archival information on the Internet. NEH has supported the development of EAD and encourages applicants to use it in creating Internet-accessible archival finding aids.

May I combine activities to arrange and describe a collection and to digitize portions of it? Yes, this is permissible, as is proposing to do these activities individually. Whether or not a hybrid approach is best will depend on many factors, including the volume of the materials, their format and condition, their current state of intellectual and physical control, and, of course, their significance for humanities use. Be sure to explain the rationale for your approach, taking care to demonstrate that the proposed outcomes will meet identifiable user needs.

Should I have consultants and a board of advisors set up and committed before I apply? Yes. Many projects require early consultation with scholarly advisers and technical experts to plan for the implementation. The collaboration of highly qualified and experienced people makes it more likely that evaluators will endorse an application.

What are some examples of strategies for broadening the financial base of support for an ongoing project? To broaden your base of support, you may consider, for instance, creating a special fund or an endowment for the project, adopting membership fees in consortial efforts, or establishing collaborative agreements to support permanent positions or services. You are not limited to these examples.

Should I submit sample materials as an appendix to the application's narrative? Yes. Samples of descriptive records greatly assist evaluators to assess the quality of a project's bibliographic product. A lengthy finding aid need not be included in its entirety, but it is advisable to include a scope and content note and several pages of folder level descriptions. Several sample catalog records or other relevant bibliographic items should be appended, as appropriate. Sample entries, records, the results to specific database queries, etc., can let evaluators draw conclusions about the significance of a proposed reference work or resource, the accuracy of the information presented, and the quality of editorial work.

Whom should I ask to provide letters of support? Letters of support should come from persons who can objectively assess the importance of the project to the humanities. Writers may include people who know or have used the collections in question, can attest to the need for the proposed reference work or research tool, or can confirm that the proposed research and development work addresses an important preservation or access issues in the humanities. They should not be project participants. Also, the letters should be submitted to the project director (not separately to NEH) and submitted with the application.

My application was unsuccessful. Is there anything I may do to increase my chances for success next time? You may request copies of the comments by evaluators. A revised application should take into consideration the issues they raised. However, a resubmitted application will be reviewed by persons who will not have knowledge of or access to the previous application file.